BestSeedanceBrowse All →
comparisonprompt-engineeringworkflow

One Prompt, Three Models: How to Adapt the Same Idea for Seedance, Sora, and Kling

A practical translation guide: keep your creative intent, but tweak the emphasis so Seedance, Sora, and Kling each deliver their best version of the same shot.

By Best Seedance Prompts

Most people rewrite everything when switching models. You do not need to. You need to change emphasis.

Think of it like this:

  • Seedance: camera choreography + action clarity
  • Sora: realism cues + physical plausibility
  • Kling: simplicity + fast iteration

Baseline idea (same across all three)

A cyclist rides through a neon city at night in the rain.

Seedance version (camera + choreography)

A cyclist rides through a neon city at night in the rain, wet asphalt reflections, atmospheric haze.
Shot: wide shot, 24mm, deep depth of field.
Camera: smooth tracking shot parallel to the cyclist, constant speed, no cuts.
Action: water spray from tires, passing cars create light streaks, cyclist turns head briefly.
Lighting: cyan/magenta neon split, controlled highlights, subtle film grain.
Constraints: smooth motion, stable anatomy, no random camera jumps.

Sora version (realism cues)

Photoreal footage style: a cyclist riding through a neon city at night in heavy rain.
Realistic wet reflections, believable motion blur, consistent exposure, natural camera shake kept minimal.
Camera: stabilized follow shot, shallow depth of field on cyclist, bokeh neon.
Avoid: stylized anime look, exaggerated effects, impossible physics.

Kling version (short and repeatable)

Neon city night rain. Cyclist riding fast. Wet reflections. Tracking shot. Cinematic.

Then iterate in Kling by changing one thing per reroll:

  • change camera move
  • change palette
  • change speed

When you get a winner, "upgrade" it into the Seedance-style structured prompt.

Ready to try Seedance 2.0?

Browse our collection of community-curated prompts

Browse All Prompts →